![]()
**The Decline and Fall of the Quarterly Business Review (QBR) | SaaStr**
For decades, the Quarterly Business Review (QBR) was a cornerstone of business operations, particularly in the SaaS (Software as a Service) and B2B industries. It was a structured, recurring meeting where vendors and customers came together to review performance metrics, discuss goals, and align on future strategies. However, in recent years, the QBR has been losing its relevance and effectiveness, leading many companies to question its value. In this article, we’ll explore the reasons behind the decline of the QBR, the challenges it faces in today’s fast-paced business environment, and what the future holds for customer success and account management practices.
---
### **The Rise of the QBR: A Brief History**
The QBR emerged as a formalized process in the late 20th century, as businesses sought to strengthen relationships with their customers and ensure alignment on mutual goals. The idea was simple: every quarter, vendors and customers would meet to review key performance indicators (KPIs), assess the health of the relationship, and plan for the next quarter.
In the SaaS world, QBRs became particularly important as a way to ensure customer retention and expansion. SaaS companies rely heavily on recurring revenue, and QBRs were seen as a proactive way to prevent churn, identify upsell opportunities, and demonstrate value to customers. For many years, the QBR was a staple of customer success strategies.
---
### **The Decline of the QBR**
Despite its historical importance, the QBR has been steadily losing its appeal. Several factors have contributed to its decline:
#### 1. **The Pace of Modern Business**
In today’s fast-moving business environment, quarterly reviews often feel too infrequent and too slow. Customers expect real-time insights and continuous engagement, not a retrospective meeting every three months. By the time a QBR rolls around, the data being reviewed may already be outdated, and the customer’s priorities may have shifted.
#### 2. **Overemphasis on Vendor-Centric Agendas**
One of the biggest criticisms of QBRs is that they often focus more on the vendor’s needs than the customer’s. Many QBRs devolve into a one-sided presentation where the vendor showcases their achievements, rather than a collaborative discussion about the customer’s goals and challenges. This misalignment can leave customers feeling disengaged and undervalued.
#### 3. **Lack of Personalization**
In an era where personalization is key to customer success, QBRs often fail to deliver. Many QBRs follow a cookie-cutter format, with generic slides and metrics that don’t address the unique needs of the customer. This lack of customization can make the QBR feel like a box-ticking exercise rather than a meaningful conversation.
#### 4. **The Rise of Alternative Engagement Models**
As technology has advanced, new tools and methods for customer engagement have
